Cases 1 - 10 of 380
PEEPLES v. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2024cv00454
Defendant:
'ICE EM', KALLIS, S. YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
JOE W. PEEPLES, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ROLLINS v. OSBORNE et al
as 1:2024cv01525
Defendant:
MARI MILLER, JOHN DOE, ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff:
EVAN ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00115
Defendant:
B. SAWICKI, JOHN DOE 1, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
NOAH SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOLLETTE v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01434
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ALAN FOLLETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01402
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv01386
Defendant:
PAULA DICKSON, TISHA THOMPSON, J.D. BALLANGER and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILDER v. CENTURION OF INDIANA AND EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2024cv01326
Defendant:
JONES, CENTURION OF INDIANA AND EMPLOYEES, VANDERVORT and others
Plaintiff:
EARL D. WILDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHOREY v. GREER et al
as 1:2024cv01135
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, QUINTON GREER and JOHN DOE #2
Plaintiff:
CURTIS A. SCHOREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. HERNANDEZ et al
as 1:2024cv01140
Defendant:
JOHN DOE (#1), JOHN DOE (#2), HERNANDEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JAQUELL DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
