Cases 1 - 10 of 331
Watkins v. Swaney
as 6:2022cv00236
Petitioner:
Carl Ravon Watkins
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney and G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baker v. Chandler et al
as 0:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ashley Heath A Baker, Anthony Baker, Ashley Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Larry D. Chandler, Cookie Crews, Rhonda May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Dennis A. Forbes
Defendant:
Hector Joyner, Lt. Minix, Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jihae v. Gilley
as 6:2022cv00223
Petitioner:
Na'im Jihae and Dumonde Wiley
Respondent:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Helton v. Whitson et al
as 0:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Thomas Helton
Defendant:
Kristen Whitson, Brian Baier, Mrs. Roane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Compton v. Ferguson
as 2:2022cv00138
Petitioner:
Alfie Compton
Respondent:
Warden Jessie Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nielsen v. FMC Lexington Warden
as 5:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Ephraim J. Nielsen
Defendant:
FMC Lexington Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Howard v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 0:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael Adrian Howard
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Quality Corrections Healthcare et al
as 2:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dave Burke
Defendant:
Quality Corrections Healthcare, C.E.O. Johnny E. Bates, Doctor Kern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Rose
as 7:2022cv00105
Petitioner:
Lamont Walker
Respondent:
D. Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
