Cases 11 - 20 of 331
Norris v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Mark Norris
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mart et al v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mart, Jr. and Billy Joe Chesser
Defendant:
Joshua Hensley, James David Green and Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Simmons
Defendant:
United States of America and Esque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mandrell v. Carter County Detention Center
as 0:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Steven Mandrell
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutherland v. USA et al
as 5:2022cv00256
Petitioner:
Eric C. Sutherland
Respondent:
USA and David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sutherland v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00237
Petitioner:
Eric C. Sutherland
Respondent:
United States and Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Osborne v. State of Ohio et al
as 5:2022cv00233
Petitioner:
Donna-Kay Osborne
Respondent:
State of Ohio and U.S. Federal Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Kent Hendrickson, Glenn E. Acree, Christopher Nickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Green
as 0:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Marlon Henson
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mantey v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
David Anthony Mantey
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
