Cases 21 - 30 of 331
Moore v. Hughes
as 7:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
Jason J. Moore
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Killy v. Warden Gomez
as 6:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
Alex Platzer Killy
Respondent:
Warden Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Assibey-Mensah v. USA
as 6:2022cv00148
Petitioner:
James Taylor Assibey-Mensah
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burke v. Kenton County Fiscal Court et al
as 2:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Dave Burke
Defendant:
Kenton County Fiscal Court, Unknown, Kenton County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Quarles v. Reynolds et al
as 0:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Roshaun D. Quarles
Defendant:
J. Reynolds, Melissa Pelfrey, Jacqueline Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlap v. Department of Justice et al
as 7:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Anttwaine M. Dunlap
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Werman v. Joyner et al
as 2:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Alfred Werman
Defendant:
Warden H. Joyner, Psycology Dr. Lefever, Mr. Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Jordan
as 5:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
Robert Markham Taylor
Respondent:
Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curtis v. Trivette et al
as 0:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Tori Toni Curtis
Defendant:
Amy Trivette, Cookie Crews and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. USA
as 6:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
