Cases 41 - 50 of 331
Smith v. Barberville Police Department et al
as 6:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Ellis Smith
Defendant:
Barberville Police Department, Chase Henson and Karl Middleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Gilley
as 6:2022cv00043
Petitioner:
Christopher Stewart Wilson
Respondent:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carlisle v. McIntire
as 2:2022cv00025
Petitioner:
Rodney Carlisle, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Abby McIntire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Troxell v. Morgan et al
as 6:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Destil Eugene Troxell
Defendant:
Philip R. Morgan and Larry E. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Cookie Crews, Brad Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 2:2022cv00019
Petitioner:
Anthony Geno Martinson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arlinghaus v. Campbell County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Executor:
Debbie Arlinghaus
Defendant:
Campbell County Detention Center, James Daley, Mark Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Milam v. McCullam et al
as 6:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Harold Michael Milam
Defendant:
Anthony McCullam, Unknown Actors, Kentucky Association of Counties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Althauser et al
as 7:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
E. Althauser, R. Ward and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sadler v. Clifford et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sadler
Defendant:
Angela Clifford, Shelli Conyers Votaw, Dawn Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
