Cases 31 - 40 of 2,219
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Popp v. Sharco Express, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Steven Popp
Defendant:
Sharco Express, LLC and Raymond K. Gifford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mandrell v. Carter County Detention Center
as 0:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Steven Mandrell
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sutherland v. USA et al
as 5:2022cv00256
Petitioner:
Eric C. Sutherland
Respondent:
USA and David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sutherland v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00237
Petitioner:
Eric C. Sutherland
Respondent:
United States and Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Osborne v. State of Ohio et al
as 5:2022cv00233
Petitioner:
Donna-Kay Osborne
Respondent:
State of Ohio and U.S. Federal Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shanks et al v. Rust et al
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Laura Shanks and Amy Downton
Defendant:
David Rust, Janis Winbigler, Amanda Donelan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Kent Hendrickson, Glenn E. Acree, Christopher Nickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
