Cases 41 - 50 of 2,219
Henson v. Green
as 0:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Marlon Henson
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mantey v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
David Anthony Mantey
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dichiara v. Summit Medical Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Dr. Amy Dichiara
Defendant:
Summit Medical Group, Inc. doing business as St. Elizabeth Physicians, St. Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc. doing business as St. Elizabeth Healthcare, Dr. Robert Prichard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. Hughes
as 7:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
Jason J. Moore
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zelesnik v. Kentucky et al
as 2:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Kentucky, Ky Senator Paul Rand, Tom T. Wallace and others
Killy v. Warden Gomez
as 6:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
Alex Platzer Killy
Respondent:
Warden Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dawan v. State of Kentucky
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Mujahid Dawan
Defendant:
State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Sara L. Peterson
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Zelesnik v. Senator Rand Paul et al
as 2:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Senator Rand Paul, Chief Justice Zalla, UC President Neville Pinto and others
Lewandowski et al v. Deters et al
as 2:2022cv00106
Counter Defendant:
Corey R. Lewandowski and Lewandowski Strategic Advisors,LLC
Counter Claimant:
Eric C. Deters, Deters for Governor Campaign, Bulldog Media,Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
