Cases 51 - 60 of 4,743
Williams v. Kent et al
as 1:2024cv00770
Defendant:
Ray Kent and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lamar OCI North, LLC v. Garfield, Charter Township of
as 1:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Lamar OCI North, LLC
Defendant:
Garfield, Charter Township of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gant v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00754
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Eric Gant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lamar OCI North, LLC v. East Bay, Charter Township of
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Lamar OCI North, LLC
Defendant:
East Bay, Charter Township of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00759
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00749
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00748
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act
Sifuentes v. Jonker et al
as 1:2024cv00742
Respondent:
Janet T. Neff, Robert J. Jonker, Jane M. Beckering and others
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER David Angel Sifuentes, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
