Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00879
Plaintiff:
Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation , Invensys Systems, Inc. and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Whirlpool Properties, Inc. et al v. Newage Products Inc.
as 1:2013cv00492
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Properties, Inc. and Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
Newage Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Vitran Express, Inc. v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2012cv01317
Plaintiff:
Vitran Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
in re: Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2012mc00042
Petitioner:
Whirlpool Corporation
Respondent:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Deyco, Inc. v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Deyco, Inc.
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whirlpool Corporation v. China Pacific Property Insurance Company, Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv01143
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
China Pacific Property Insurance Company, Ltd. and Cunningham Lindsey, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Whirlpool Corporation v. W.A.B. Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00814
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
W.A.B. Enterprises, Inc., Annette M. Ramsey and Robert D. Ramsey, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hosbein v. Whirlpool Corporation Long-Term Disability Plan
as 1:2011cv00428
Plaintiff:
Renee Hosbein
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation Long-Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
