Cases 21 - 30 of 349
Thompson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thompson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
Charles Thompson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thompson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jeanne Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. Genesco, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
Genesco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Thompson v. Replacements, Ltd.
as 4:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
Replacements, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Thompson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lynn Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. Cockrell et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thompson
Defendant:
Joshua Cockrell and Robert Gerholdt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prosser v. USHealth Advisors, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Defendant:
USHealth Advisors, LLC, US Health Advisors, LLC, Patrick Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Thompson et al v. Vintage Stock, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sheila Thompson and Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
Vintage Stock, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.