Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Li v. Mayorkas et al
as 5:2024cv00281
Defendant: Merrick Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas
Plaintiff: Tonghua Li
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00017
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00405
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $2,599.00 in U. S. Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00192
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $2,599.00 in U. S. Currency, $8,000.00 in U. S. Currency and $691,814.00 in U. S. Currency
Claimant: Lis Johansen , Karen Pedersen-MacDonald and Rebecca L. Lalone
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Bridgetree, Inc. et al v. Red F Marketing LLC et al
as 5:2011mc00023
Plaintiff: Bridgetree, Inc. and Two Bit Dog, LLC
Defendant: Red F Marketing LLC, Target Point, LLC, Daniel Roselli and others
Counter_defendant: Bridgetree, Inc. , Mark Beck and Chris Talley
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. A 2002 BMW 745 LI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00170
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: A 2002 BMW 745 LI, VIN: WBAGN634X2DR04769 and A 2003 Cadillac Escalade, VIN: 3GYFK66N13G251324
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00011
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Li v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2007cv00462
Plaintiff: Tong Li
Defendant: Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Richard Gottlieb and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?