Cases 1 - 10 of 988
Doe v. Nash County Board of Education et al
as 5:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Nash County Board of Education, Daniel Colvin, Steven Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 4:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Sheila Lee
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, M O'hara, Officer Rodiguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Sheila Lee
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, M O'hara, Officer Rodiguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colvin v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Dantonio Colvin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sherrod v. Cooper et al
as 5:2018ct03322
Defendant:
Elaine Marshall, Janet L. Yellen, Wake Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Marion L. Sherrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierson et al v. Lewis et al
as 5:2017mc00014
Petitioner:
John R. Pierson, United States Militia, Conroy Henderson and others
Respondent:
Ola Lewis, Jerry Brown, John Kerry and others
Wilder v. Colvin et al
as 7:2016cv00260
Plaintiff:
Lawrence V. Wilder, Sr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Social Security Administration, John M. Wilder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard, Jr. v. Colvin
as 7:2016cv00417
Plaintiff:
Edward Joseph Richard, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
