Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
C. C. S., et al v. CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES OF ORANGE COUNTY, et al
as 1:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
C. C. S., VICTORIA SHAW CARTER and ZACHARY CHASE CARTER
Defendant:
CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES OF ORANGE COUNTY, ANNETTE ATWATER, CRYSTAL MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAGLEY v. GUILFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al
as 1:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BAGLEY
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, DETRA HOPKIN, TONYA DUPREE-FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00887
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
HONEYCUTT v. ROCKINGHAM CITY POLICE et al
as 1:2009cv00912
Plaintiff:
LISA M HONEYCUTT
Defendant:
THE CITY OF ROCKINGHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, R. B. LUGABIHL and BIG LOTS STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
