Cases 41 - 50 of 3,169
THAXTON v. CASWELL COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00533
Defendant:
TONY DURDEN, JR., OTIS FOSTER, KEN MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff:
TYLAN DELSHAUN THAXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THAXTON v. CASWELL COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00534
Defendant:
SHERIFF TONY DURDEN, JR., JOHN DOE CORPORATION, KEN MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff:
TALAISHA DAYSHAUN THAXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BRITT v. CASWELL COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00535
Defendant:
JOHN DOE CORPORATION, SHERIFF TONY DURDEN, JR., KEN MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff:
LA TOYE ANN BRITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARCHER v. CABARRUS COUNTY COURTHOUSE, DISTRICT COURT DIVISION et al
as 1:2024cv00531
Defendant:
ATTORNEY BENJAMIN BAUCOM, ATTORNEY H. JAY WHITE, SR., JUDGE CHRISTY WILHELM and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY D. ARCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
JOHNSTON v. HAIRSTON
as 1:2024cv00501
Defendant:
SANDRA J. HAIRSTON
Plaintiff:
MARY JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
SELLERS v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
TYQASHIA SELLERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2024cv00475
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA and KOURY CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
