Cases 1 - 10 of 25
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Petitioner:
ANTHONY L. HOOVER
Respondent:
STEPHEN WADDELL, JOHN GRAY and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HOOVER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00497
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DEQUAN AHMAD HOOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, ROY A. COOPER III, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER EL v. WADDEL et al
as 1:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDEL, JASON ADAMS, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER EL v. FORSYTH COUNTY
as 1:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. HOOVER EL
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER EL v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00271
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BELTON v. FIELDS
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
DARREN S. BELTON
Defendant:
RONNIE FIELDS, BILL FLINT, MS. GARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MOORE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE/DEPT., BILL FLINT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER-EL v. MAURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2019cv00340
Respondent:
MAURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOOVER EL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ADULT DIVISION
as 1:2018cv00296
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ADULT DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
