Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Mauney v. Burke County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2019cv00032
Defendant:
Burke County Sheriff's Office, l J. Boilinger, Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley L. Mauney
Burke County v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Burke County
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Caballero v. Boney et al
as 3:2016cv00151
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Caballero
Defendant:
Phillip Boney, FNU Burke, FNU Heh and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin Bey v. Pittman et al
as 1:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
FNU Pittman, FNU Ball, FNU Burleson and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
TD Bank, N.A. v. Lenox Square, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Lenox Square, LLC, Landover Burke LLC, Jack L. Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke v. New York Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Richard C Burke
Defendant:
New York Life Insurance Company , Unum Group , Unum Life Insurance Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. 1585 Amherst Rd., Morganton, NC, Burke County
as 1:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1585 Amherst Road, Morganton, NC, Burke County
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
Bell v. Burks et al
as 3:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant:
Paul R. Burks , Dawn Wright-Olivares , Alexandre de Brantes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Doe 2 v. Burke County Board of Education
as 1:2013cv00300
Defendant:
Burke County Board of Education
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
