Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Bitton v. Chitrid et al
as 1:2012cv05359
Plaintiff:
Danielle Bitton, Marcelle Bitton, Marcelle Fhima and others
Defendant:
Simon Chitrid, President Obama, Mayor of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ladislas v. Lerandy
as 2:2012cv05342
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ladislas
Defendant:
Laurianne Lerandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 - INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION REMEDIES
Biton v. Aventura et al
as 1:2012cv05426
Defendant:
ACLU, Aaronson Rapport Feinstein Deutch, Ann Friedfertig and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Biton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Biton v. Washington Dulles Airport Authority et al
as 1:2012cv05331
Defendant:
AFA, Admiral of the British Navy, Bain Capital and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Biton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Biton v. Prime Minister of Israel et al
as 1:2012cv05234
Defendant:
AFA, AFL-CIO, ALPA and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Biton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Majerowitz v. Daniels Norelli Scully & Cecere, P.C.
as 1:2012cv04590
Defendant:
Daniels Norelli Scully & Cecere, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Yitzchok Majerowitz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Daniel v. Comenity LLC et al
as 1:2012cv04411
Defendant:
C T Corporation System and Comenity LLC
Plaintiff:
Yashmine J. Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Nicholson v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
as 2:2012cv03503
Defendant:
Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reichert v. Daniels Norelli Scully & Cecere, P.C.
as 1:2012cv02815
Defendant:
Daniels Norelli Scully & Cecere, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Peter P. Reichert
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mazzone v. Vibrant Media Inc.
as 1:2012cv02672
Plaintiff:
Michelle Kuswanto and Daniel Mazzone
Defendant:
Vibrant Media Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
