Cases 51 - 60 of 404
Tsadilas v. Roper
as 2:2021cv02765
Defendant:
Matthew Roper and The Nassau County SPCA
Plaintiff:
Peter Tsadilas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02667
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02608
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McCaffrey v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01988
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Sergent Christopher Shea, Police Officer James Caravello and others
Plaintiff:
Pierce McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01267
Defendant:
Patrick Roach, Detective Michael Gaine, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Julian Douglas, Detective Keith Welz and Sahel Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Garafalo v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv05903
Defendant:
DEPUTY INSPECTOR WILLIAM GLYNN, THE CITY OF NEW YORK and DEPUTY INSPECTOR PETER ROSE
Plaintiff:
Therese Garafalo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05832
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
