Cases 1 - 10 of 776
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06432
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06304
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05780
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05464
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04715
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thompson v. Sullivan Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv03423
Plaintiff:
Tykhan Thompson
Defendant:
Sullivan Correctional Facility, Frarik-Captain of SHU and Frankcoti-Captain of SMU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03291
Plaintiff:
Clayton Howard
Defendant:
State Of New York, City of New York, Richmond County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. King Teleservices, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv03132
Plaintiff:
Byron Thompson
Defendant:
King Teleservices, L.L.C. and Skyview Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
