Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lissade v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
James Carl Lissade
Defendant:
Police Officer Romel Hill, Police Officer Elijah Boyle, Adrian Police Office Duran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ochoa v. Aucay General Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03866
Plaintiff:
Romel Ochoa
Defendant:
Aucay General Construction Inc., Hugo Aucay and Aucay General Construction Inc. doing business as K & T General Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hightower v. Beyond Better Foods, LLC
as 1:2019cv00004
Defendant:
Beyond Better Foods, LLC
Plaintiff:
Romel Hightower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hightower v. American Halal Company, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01293
Defendant:
American Halal Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Romel Hightower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Samuels v. United States of America
as 1:2017mc01972
Petitioner:
Romel Samuels
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
J&J Sports Production, Inc. v. Caribbean Garden Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03796
Defendant:
Romel Arjune and Caribbean Garden Restaurant & Lounge, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Wingate et al v. Quattrochi et al
as 1:2014cv02666
Defendant:
ADA Brazinksi Kings, ADA Carroll Kelly Richmond, ADA Christopher Lin New York and others
Plaintiff:
Moses Bethune, Keith Darnell Fair, Karmik Grant-Byas and others
Released On 5/14/2014:
Romell Duran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcus v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv01810
Plaintiff:
Romel Marcus
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
