Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Grodko et al v. MOL Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09397
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Grodko
Defendant:
MOL Global, Inc., Ganesh Kumar Bangah, Allan Sai Wah Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Freedman v. MOL Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09357
Plaintiff:
Michael Freedman
Defendant:
MOL Global, Inc. , Ganesh Kumar Bangah, Allan Sai Wah Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Jones v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv09202
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Jones
Defendant:
City of New York , Jose Delrosario, Sai Bharadwaj and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Guan et al v. New Akita Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03970
Plaintiff:
Yi Sheng Guan and Sai Zhang Guan
Defendant:
New Akita Inc., Jin Cheng Zhang and John Li
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
World Cable Inc. v. Lalon TV, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03432
Plaintiff:
World Cable Inc.
Defendant:
Lalon TV, Inc., Ahmodul Barobhuiya, Shahinul Karim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Espinosa et al v. Fishkill SAI Hospitality, LLC et al
as 7:2014cv01237
Plaintiff:
Remedios Aguayo Espinosa and Maria Julia Ramirez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Fishkill SAI Hospitality, LLC, Fishkill Hospitality Group, LLC, Vikas Mehta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ang v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv08918
Plaintiff:
Yong Sai Ang
Defendant:
United States of America and IRS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Hall v. Sarrica et al
as 1:2013cv07315
Plaintiff:
Frank Hall
Defendant:
Frank Sarrica, James Cahill, Sai Yee Tsang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mandell v. U.S Government et al
as 1:2013cv06943
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mandell
Defendant:
U.S Government, U.S. White house, Obmaba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lin v. Sun Sai Gai Restaurant Inc et al
as 1:2013cv04346
Plaintiff:
Shi Rui Lin
Defendant:
Sun Sai Gai Restaurant Inc, Van Lua Tran, Raymond Moy and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
