Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Shepherd v. Smith et al
as 6:2024cv06487
Defendant:
Rochester Police Department, Jacob M. Carter, David E. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah John Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2024cv00552
Defendant:
Suicide Prevention and Crisis Services, Inc., Paula L. Feroleto, City of Buffalo and others
Plaintiff:
Zakkiyya Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Defendant:
Meghan Lutz, Matthew Pynn, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Defendant:
Richard Kloch, Frank Sedita, III, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Santiago et al
as 1:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Myles Carter
Defendant:
Nicole Santiago, Adam Hyde and Richard Arcangel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pynn v. NYS Unified Court System et al
as 1:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
NYS Unified Court System, Judge Kevin Carter, Andrew Isenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Carter
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Jevon Howard
Defendant:
Shawn Jay-Z Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Carter et al
as 1:2021cv00782
Plaintiff:
Dino Victor Clay
Defendant:
Kevin M. Carter, Christopher Brechtel, Ayoka Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter-Sapp v. Hupkowitz et al
as 1:2020cv01889
Plaintiff:
Adm. Kailah Carter-Sapp and Kailah Carter-Sapp
Defendant:
Ofc. Feldmann, Ofc. William Fannan, Dir. JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Carter et al
as 1:2020cv00417
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Jevon Howard
Defendant:
Shawn Jay-Z Carter, Damon Dame Dash and Kareem Biggs Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
