Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley, Dessey Cheers and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heyward v. Dinkins et al
as 3:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
L. M. Heyward
Defendant:
Veronica Dinkins, K. Plank, R Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Feagin v. Mansfield Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Lee Feagin
Defendant:
Mansfield Police Department, Officer Jordan Moore, Officer Mark Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mustin v. Wainwright, et al
as 3:2021cv00321
Defendant:
Michelle Turner, Katrina Rostorfer, Randon Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Mustin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfenbarger et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00510
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Wolfenbarger and Jeffery Woods
Defendant:
R.D. Smith, Lyneal Wainwright, Gary C. Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wykle v. Davis et al
as 3:2017cv02211
Plaintiff:
Travis Jay Wykle
Defendant:
Michael Davis, Neil Turner, Rebecca Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction et al
as 3:2017cv01180
Plaintiff:
Jeffery L. Howard
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, Neil Turner , Blaire Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blair v. USA
as 1:2016cv01616
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Tony C. Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blair v. Farley
as 4:2011cv01189
Petitioner:
Terry Blair
Respondent:
Robert L. Farley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eisnaugle v. Blair et al
as 1:2009cv02908
Plaintiff:
Leonard H. Eisnaugle
Defendant:
Keith Blair, Ronnie Shawber, Crawford Co Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
