Tort Product Liability Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 101 - 110 of 645
Lopez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03005
Plaintiff: Consuelo Lopez
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marshall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03008
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff: William Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McNutt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03011
Plaintiff: Rachel McNutt
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McAdams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03009
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jerry McAdams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meiner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03012
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff: Matthew Meiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02967
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Wesley Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foreman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02968
Plaintiff: Robin Foreman
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frank v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02969
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Stephen Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Furnace v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02970
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Darrell Furnace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gaidosh v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02971
Plaintiff: William Gaidosh
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?