Real Property Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,668
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Pruitt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03097
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ernest Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pugh v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03098
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shuntez Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Purdon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03099
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: James C. Purdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Quinn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03100
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Montie Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03101
Plaintiff: Louis Rivera
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03102
Plaintiff: Pedro Rodriguez
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Russell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03103
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff: Chad Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanders v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03104
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Donald Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sauseda v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03105
Plaintiff: Michael Sauseda
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Searcy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03106
Plaintiff: Gerald Searcy
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?