Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Schmidt v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv02575
Plaintiff:
James Schmidt
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schmidt v. Fischer et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Defendant:
Brianna Fischer, Brianna Johnson, Tea Shop Productions and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
White v. Dave Dennis Inc., et al.
as 3:2021cv00328
Plaintiff:
Saylor R White
Defendant:
Dave Dennis Inc, Emily Augspurger, Beavercreek Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04771
Plaintiff:
Robert Schmidt
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Feagan et al v. The Office Of The Ohio Disciplinary Counsel For The Supreme Court Of The State Of Ohio et al
as 1:2021cv00399
Defendant:
The Office Of The Ohio Disciplinary Counsel For The Supreme Court Of The State Of Ohio, Kelli C. Schmidt, Donald Holtz and others
Plaintiff:
Eric C Deters, Glenn Feagan and Deters Law Firm PC II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schmidt v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01560
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Keith Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05474
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Schmidt and Michael Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt v. City of Lima
as 2:2020cv04971
Plaintiff:
Nancy Schmidt
Defendant:
City of Lima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
