Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Scott et al v. Clorox Company, The
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Martin Scott and Cindi Scott
Defendant:
Clorox Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Stephens et al v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Linh Stephens and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Rodney Sparkman, April Seibert, James Hubert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Littlefield et al v. Gilead Sciences Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00055
Plaintiff:
Dustin Chase Littlefield and Charity Michelle Snyder Littlefield
Defendant:
Daniel O'Day, Geronimo Sahagun, Banner Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cruz et al v. Johnson Matthey Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Cruz , Scott Bender , Konark Ogra and others
Defendant:
Johnson Matthey Inc. , University of Tulsa, The , Chevron Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mathis v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00455
Plaintiff:
Angie Mathis
Defendant:
Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. and Aaron Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00487
Plaintiff:
Cara Martin , Jacob Kennedy and RK
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Wilhelm v. Caliber Oilfield Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00581
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott Wilhelm
Defendant:
Caliber Oilfield Services, Inc. , Dan's Casing, LLC, Dan's Casing Crews, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fulton v. Martin
as 4:2013cv00797
Plaintiff:
Darren Fulton
Defendant:
Christopher Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2013cv00143
Plaintiff:
Todd Martin
Defendant:
Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Privitt v. Target Corporation
as 4:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Martin Privitt
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
