Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Doe v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County et al
as 4:2024cv00414
Defendant:
Tulsa Public Schools, Scott Childers, Cindy Largent and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. City of Sapulpa et al
as 4:2024cv00392
Defendant:
Sapulpa Police Department, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe 1 et al v. Juvenile Bureau of Tulsa County District Court et al
as 4:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Parent Doe 10, Parent Doe 1, Parent Doe 13 and others
Defendant:
Dquan Doyle, Juvenile Bureau of Tulsa County District Court, Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2023cv00539
Defendant:
Independent School District No. 9 of Tulsa County, The State of Oklahoma, Ed Lake and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGill v. Ballard et al
as 4:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Samuel Curtis McGill, Jr
Defendant:
Matt Ballard, George Gibbs, Jr., Mary Leavell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
