Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
OWENS v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
STEPHEN OWENS
Respondent:
BLANCHE CARNEY, JOHN/JANE DOE #1, JOHN/JANE DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN OWENS
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS COMMISSIONER, JOHN/JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBICHAW v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2021cv05282
Plaintiff:
RENALDO M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
SEAN P. MCGEE, JOSEPH M. LYNCH, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RISTER v. MEYER et al
as 2:2021cv05058
Plaintiff:
TARRELL R. RISTER
Defendant:
GREGORY MEYER, MICHAEL T. LAVERGHETTA, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HECKER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Defendant:
SEARGENT WHARTON, JIMMY KIMMEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R HECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2021cv02430
Defendant:
SR. OFFICIAL USCIS Tracy Renaud, ASSOC DIRECTOR USCIS CONNIE NOLAN, DIRECTOR USCIS LAURA ZUCHOWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE # 2 and #1 JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
DOE et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 5:2021cv02430
Defendant:
CONNIE NOLAN, LAURA ZUCHOWSKI, TRACY RENAUD and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE # 2 and #1 JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
