Cases 21 - 30 of 3,773
YOUNG v. SCHADT et al
as 5:2019cv02291
Defendant:
JONES CHEMICALS, INC., BUDDY SCHADT and JCI JONES CHEMICALS
Plaintiff:
ANTWAUN YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DALANAS v. UNI-KEM CHEMICALS, INC.
as 2:2019cv01369
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DALANAS
Defendant:
UNI-KEM CHEMICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ALBERT v. UNI-KEM CHEMICALS, INC.
as 2:2019cv01368
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALBERT
Defendant:
UNI-KEM CHEMICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
as 5:2018cv04878
Plaintiff:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
Defendant:
THE PROCTER AND GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNICAST, INC. v. BAYER A.G. et al
as 5:2018cv03438
Defendant:
BASF SE, MCNS POLYURETHANES USA INC., MITSUI CHEMICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
UNICAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
EMMA CHEMICALS CO., INC. v. BASF SE et al
as 2:2018cv02958
Defendant:
BASF CORP., BASF SE, MCNS POLYURETHANES USA INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EMMA CHEMICALS CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLLINS v. AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS, INC.
as 5:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
LINA COLLINS
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
STEPANOFF et al v. TIMBERLINE CHEMICAL, INC.
as 5:2016cv05474
Plaintiff:
THEODORE STEPANOFF and ROBIN STEPANOFF
Defendant:
TIMBERLINE CHEMICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CITY OF MATTOON v. REICHL et al
as 2:2016cv00319
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MATTOON
Defendant:
FRANK A. REICHL, GEO SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, INC., GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT v. REICHL et al
as 2:2015cv06799
Plaintiff:
EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Defendant:
FRANK A. REICHL , GEO SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, INC., CHEMTRADE LOGISTICS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
