Cases 1 - 10 of 35
PEREZ v. THE SCANLAN AGENCY, INC.
as 2:2016cv06197
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
THE SCANLAN AGENCY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. STEVEN KEARES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05072
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
STEVEN KEARES, INC., HARRY S. KEARES and STEVEN KEARS, INC. 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. BELANGER et al
as 2:2016cv04427
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
A. KENNETH BELANGER, JO-ANN I. BELANGER and BELANGER AND CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. LAS MARGARITAS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01390
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
LAS MARGARITAS, INC. , FELIPE PEREZ and VICTOR PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
URRUTIA Y URRUTIA et al v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2016cv01351
Plaintiff:
JUAN URRUTIA Y URRUTIA and ROMULO DE PAZ BRITO
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR , PORTIA WU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 070
PEREZ v. LLOYD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01079
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
LLOYD INDUSTRIES, INC. and WILLIAM P. LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
PEREZ v. PHILADELPHIA COMMITTEE FOR THE PREVENTION OF BLINDNESS
as 2:2016cv01030
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COMMITTEE FOR THE PREVENTION OF BLINDNESS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. ENCORIUM GROUP, INC.
as 2:2015cv05365
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
ENCORIUM GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. ICS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv03408
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
ICS CORPORATION , MATTHEW BASTIAN , NEW CENTURY INTEGRITY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. LAPENSOHN et al
as 2:2015cv03316
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
HOWARD LAPENSOHN, LAPENSOHN ACCOUNTING PROFESSIONALS, LLC, THE LAPENSOHN ACCOUNTING PROFESSIONALS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
