Cases 1 - 10 of 19
WATERMAN v. CORESITE REALTY CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05478
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
CORESITE REALTY CORPORATION, MICHAEL MILLEGAN, ROBERT G STUCKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
COIT v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv01568
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER, OLIVERI, GILLARDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUGH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03508
Plaintiff:
CALLUM WILSON, MAHEEN SHAFI, CHRISTOPHER ROMANO and others
Defendant:
DENNIS WILSON, JANE/JOHN DOES 1-100, RICHARD NICOLETTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
KOEHLER v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv00715
Plaintiff:
SUSAN J. KOEHLER
Defendant:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
CAMPBELL et al v. KOEHLER
as 2:2013cv04723
Plaintiff:
LENARD CAMPBELL and JACQUELYN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
EDWIN KOEHLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KOEHLER v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv35897
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E. KOEHLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KOEHLER v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2011cv01950
Petitioner:
SAMUEL KOEHLER
Respondent:
RAYMOND LAWLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KOEHLER v. A P GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, et al
as 2:2010cv68300
Plaintiff:
GERALD KOEHLER
Defendant:
A P GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, AC & S INC, AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
