Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stine v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al.
as 2:2024cv01432
Plaintiff:
John Stine
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SERRANO-BEY v. MUVHA et al
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
STACEY SERRANO-BEY and STACY SERRANO-BEY
Defendant:
(LATTANZIO?) MUVHA, KELBLE, FURGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIPTOK v. CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL
as 2:2023cv02942
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LIPTOK
Defendant:
CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL, CITY COUNCIL, DOROTHY BOTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STINE v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
MAX C. STINE
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, JOHN WETZEL, JAIME SORBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STINE v. KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2021cv05492
Plaintiff:
LISA D STINE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
STINE v. MCGINNLEY et al
as 2:2020cv05120
Petitioner:
MAX C. STINE
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and SUPERINTENDENT MCGINNLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STINE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv03073
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. STINE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALLEN et al v. STINE et al
as 2:2011cv02795
Plaintiff:
JAIME ALLEN and JOSEPH ALLEN
Defendant:
CRAIG A. STINE and CRAIG A. STINE TRUCKING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STINE et al V. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2011cv63465
Plaintiff:
VALERIE J. STINE and CHESTER STINE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
