Cases 1 - 10 of 195
Montalvo v. City of York, et al.
as 1:2024cv01459
Defendant:
PO John Doe, Detective Roland Comacho, Detective Lisa Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Matos Montalvo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ungarsky v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv01345
Defendant:
Caroline Weber and New Cumberland Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Daniel S. Ungarsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fernsler v. Swatara Township Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01253
Defendant:
Darrell Reider, Swatara Township Police Department, Deanna Muller and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fernsler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Slaughter v. Community Services Group
as 1:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Slaughter
Defendant:
Community Services Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slaughter v. Dauphin County Adult Probation et al
as 1:2024cv01170
Defendant:
Dauphin County Adult Probation and Kamela Banning
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Slaughter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Barrett et al
as 1:2024cv00881
Defendant:
Attorney Nicole Leach, Attorney Danielle Morrison and Joseph A. Barrett
Plaintiff:
Rafiyq Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Katona v. Apgar et al
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Matthew Katona
Defendant:
Joseph Apgar, Ashley Rzesewski, Shane Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
