Cases 1 - 10 of 287
O'Hara v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01617
Petitioner:
Dennis O'Hara
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Butler v. Morazcka et al
as 3:2024cv01455
Defendant:
MAJOR Jankorski, Banta, Officer John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
John Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Heckman et al v. Jumper
as 1:2024cv01016
Defendant:
Dennis J. Jumper
Plaintiff:
Janet Kemp and Matthew A. Heckman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
West-Bogans v. Guido et al
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Angela West-Bogans and Angela West
Defendant:
Judge Edward Guido, Judge Claudia Brewbaker, Judge Albert Masland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Judka v. Emmel et al
as 1:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Judka
Defendant:
Dennis Emmel, John Derek Macomber, Maxine Moul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scharff et al v. Mount Airy Casino Resort #1 LLC
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Carol Scharff and Dennis Scharff
Defendant:
Mount Airy Casino Resort, Mount Airy Casino Resort, LP, Mount Airy #1 L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dennis v. Sage
as 4:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Kevin R. Dennis
Respondent:
Jessica Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
