Cases 31 - 40 of 66
GIBSON v. FLEMMING et al
as 2:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
DERRICK GIBSON
Defendant:
MARY FLEMMING, JOHN DOE FLEMMING, JOHN DOE ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HAWTHORNE v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2016cv00359
Petitioner:
JOHN DERRICK HAWTHORNE
Respondent:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILLS v. MILLION
as 3:2015cv00241
Petitioner:
DERRICK HILLS
Respondent:
S. MILLION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FOSTER v. MAIORANA et al
as 3:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. FOSTER
Defendant:
CHARLES MAIORANA, WILLIAM R. FINK, CHARLES JR. SAMAELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRAGG v. KIRBY et al
as 2:2014cv01146
Plaintiff:
DERRICK N. BRAGG
Defendant:
PAUL E. KIRBY and PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FONTROY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DALE FONTROY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, RICHARD ELLIS, REX BETNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILLS v. KIRBY et al
as 3:2014cv00153
Petitioner:
DERRICK LEON HILLS
Respondent:
MARK KIRBY and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOWARD v. PNC BANK, NA et al
as 2:2014cv00966
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOWARD
Defendant:
PNC BANK, NA, PNC BANK ENTERPRISE, ELLEN DURBIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FONTROY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DALE FONTROY, I
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ANDREA WEIMER, CYNTHIA MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
GRIMES et al v. CHISLER BROTHERS CONTRACTING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv01159
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. GRIMES and GLADYS I. GRIMES
Defendant:
CHISLER BROTHERS CONTRACTING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, WILFORD ORR, JR., DERRICK W. SHISLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
