Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MCLAUGHLIN v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 249 et al
as 2:2024cv01197
Defendant: SF Studios, The Playtone Company and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 249
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY MCLAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
PITTSBURGH NEWSPAPER PRINTING PRESSMENS/PAPER HANDLERS LOCAL UNION 24M/9N, et al v. THE NEWSPAPER, NEWSPRINT, MAGAZINE AND FILM DELIVERY DRIVERSHELPERS, AND HANDLERS, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 211/205 et al
as 2:2022cv01207
Plaintiff: PITTSBURGH MAILERS UNION LOCAL 22, PITTSBURGH TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO. 7, PITTSBURGH NEWSPAPER PRINTING PRESSMENS/PAPER HANDLERS LOCAL UNION 24M/9N, and others
Defendant: PG PUBLICHING CO. doing business as PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE and PG PUBLISHING CO. doing business as PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00832
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00335
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PITTSBURGH MAILERS UNION LOCAL 22, A SUBORDINATE UNION OF THE COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA AFL-CIO, PITTSBURGH TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO. 7, et al v. PG PUBLISHING CO. INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00222
Plaintiff: THE NEWSPAPER, NEWSPRINT, MAGAZINE AND FILM DELIVERY DRIVERS, HELPERS, AND HANDLERS, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 211 and PITTSBURGH MAILERS UNION LOCAL 22, A SUBORDINATE UNION OF THE COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA AFL-CIO, PITTSBURGH TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO. 7,
Defendant: PG PUBLISHING CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
NEWSPAPER, NEWSPRINT, MAGAZINE AND FILM DELIVERY DRIVERS, HELPERS AND HANDLERS, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 211 v. PG PUBLISHING CO. INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01472
Plaintiff: NEWSPAPER, NEWSPRINT, MAGAZINE AND FILM DELIVERY DRIVERS, HELPERS AND HANDLERS, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 211
Defendant: PG PUBLISHING CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
GENERAL TEAMSTER, CHAUFFEURS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 249, A/W INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS v. B.L. CREAM COMPANY et al
as 2:2015cv00445
Plaintiff: GENERAL TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS AND HELPERS LOCAL NO. 249, A/W INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
Defendant: B.L. CREAM COMPANY and ALBER & LEFF FOODS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND v. GRAPHIC ARTS COLOR CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv00090
Plaintiff: GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND , GEORGE TEDESCHI and MALCOLM PRITZKER
Defendant: GRAPHIC ARTS COLOR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381
TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 30, A/W THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS v. LATROBE REGIONAL HEALTH & REHAB CENTER, INC.
as 2:2010cv01243
Plaintiff: TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 30, A/W THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
Defendant: LATROBE REGIONAL HEALTH & REHAB CENTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND et al v. T-GRAPHICS, LLC
as 2:2010cv01147
Plaintiff: GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND , GEORGE TEDESCHI and MALCOLM PRITZKER
Defendant: T-GRAPHICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?