Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Burton v. Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
as 2:2024cv02259
Petitioner:
Stephon Depaul Burton
Respondent:
Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Tennessee Dept. of Corrections (Northwest Correctional Complex)
as 2:2023cv02075
Petitioner:
Rodney V. Turner
Respondent:
Tennessee Dept. of Corrections (Northwest Correctional Complex) and Sharon N. Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finch v. Davidson County Sheriffs Dept
as 2:2020cv02066
Petitioner:
Nathan D. Finch
Respondent:
Davidson County Sheriffs Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Finch v. Davidson County Sheriff's Dept
as 2:2020cv02030
Petitioner:
Nathan Finch
Respondent:
Davidson County Sheriff's Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yarbrough v. Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv02443
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States District Court, Warden Jackson and others
Petitioner:
Anton Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Caldwell v. TN Dept. Corrections
as 2:2012cv02653
Petitioner:
Courtney Caldwell
Respondent:
TN Dept. Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pampley v. U.S. Dept. of Justice et al
as 2:2011cv02814
Petitioner:
Deloris Pampley
Respondent:
U.S. Dept. of Justice, USMS, Grenada City Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mason v. State of Tennessee Dept of Correction
as 1:2010cv01274
Petitioner:
Shelbourne J. Mason
Respondent:
State of Tennessee Dept of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murdock v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2010cv01169
Petitioner:
Marshall H. Murdock
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, TN Dept. of Corrections, TN Board of Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jett v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2010cv01170
Petitioner:
Donald R. Jett
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, TN Dept of Corrections, TN Board of Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
