Cases 21 - 30 of 133
Flores v. US Dept of Justice, et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
US Department of Justice and Texas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edison v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Edison
Defendant:
Anderson County Sheriff's Office, Jay Ruscle, Rudy Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farris v. Waldon et al
as 6:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Julius Cornelius Farris
Defendant:
Officer Jason Waldon, Chief Mark Harcrow, Judge Karen A Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00536
Petitioner:
Christopher Flores
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00483
Plaintiff:
Nancy Flores
Defendant:
United Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linares et al v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 4:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
Ismael Flores Linares and Roberta Celestino Villaldama
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hanson v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00245
Plaintiff:
Sarah Lynne Hanson
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Angelo Miguel Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. East et al
as 1:2021cv00237
Defendant:
COF Aggregate Holdings, Inc. and Jeffrey East
Plaintiff:
Mario Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flores v. Sanders et al
as 6:2021cv00145
Defendant:
Susan E Cunningham, Richard J Babcock, Shayna M McArthur and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Young et al
as 1:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and K Young
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
