Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Divers v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2021cv00058
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Divers
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mundy et al v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 2:2020cv00293
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Mundy and Debbie Mundy
Defendant:
Town-N-Country Tire & Auto Center, Inc. and Cooper Tire & Rubber Company
Not Classified By Court:
Richard Grainger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirk v. Saul, Commissioner of SSA
as 6:2020cv00382
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Kirk
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Giessen et al v. Intec Communications, LLC.
as 2:2019cv00173
Defendant:
Tekkcomm LLC and Intec Communications, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee and Roy Giessen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00405
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Mattox v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2015cv00195
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Mattox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mattox v. USA
as 4:2015cv00196
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Mattox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wicker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2013cv00370
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Wicker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00706
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
O'Hara v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its capacity as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, Henderson, NV, successor-in-interest to North American Mortgage Co.
as 2:2008cv00469
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its capacity as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, Henderson, NV, successor-in-interest to North American Mortgage Co.
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee O'Hara and Cheryl Ann O'Hara
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
