Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Rodriguez v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2015cv00653
Plaintiff:
Maria Rodriguez
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Espino et al v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 4:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Maria Alicia Espino and Jose Espino
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rodriguez v. American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
as 2:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Rodriguez
Defendant:
American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Burlington Insurance Company v. Kinder Morgan Production Company, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv00181
Plaintiff:
The Burlington Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kinder Morgan Production Company, LLC, Danny Tovar, Patton Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Castro v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 3:2014cv03503
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and David Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Luis Castro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrios v. State Farm LLoyds et al
as 4:2014cv00711
Plaintiff:
Jose Barrios
Defendant:
State Farm LLoyds and David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rojo v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 4:2014cv00684
Plaintiff:
Hector Rojo
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Delgado v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 4:2014cv00283
Plaintiff:
Apolinar Delgado
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 3:2013cv03505
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rodriguez
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and Brad Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Admiral Insurance Company v. Staz-On Roofing Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01751
Plaintiff:
Admiral Insurance Company
Defendant:
Staz-On Roofing Inc, Randall Pickle and Enrique Rodriguez
Movant:
American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
