Cases 21 - 30 of 5,678
Joe v. Director,TDCJCID
as 3:2024cv02145
Petitioner:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arista v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02034
Petitioner:
Stephen Arista
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00163
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Curtis Mayes, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gusman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00708
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Gusman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turcios v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01960
Defendant:
UTMB, Dallas County District Attorney's Office, State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Francisco Turcios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franco v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01941
Petitioner:
Ricardo Franco
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01892
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Anthony Rashad George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houges v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Tra'Shoun Dominique Houges
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01820
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Timmy Antonio Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plemons v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00155
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Paul Gene Plemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
