Cases 21 - 30 of 109
Display Technologies LLC v. Yamaha Corporation of America
as 3:2017cv03005
Plaintiff:
Display Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Yamaha Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pena-Gonzalez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2016cv00013
Petitioner:
Ruben Pena-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Correction Corporation of America and Trinity Service Comer Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jakhanio v. Corrections Corporation of America (CCA)
as 6:2015cv00068
Plaintiff:
Rolle Jakhanio
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America (CCA)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00041
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00038
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pena-Gonzalez v. BOP et al
as 6:2015cv00036
Petitioner:
Ruben Pena-Gonzalez
Respondent:
BOP , Correction Corporation of America and Trinity Service Comer Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00019
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Compucom Systems Inc et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv02948
Defendant:
NEC Display Solutions of America Inc, NEC Corporation of America, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Plaintiff:
CompuCom Systems Inc
Consolidated Plaintiff:
MetroPCS Wireless Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
