Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02713
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Evans v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv01997
Plaintiff: Ishmael A. Evans
Defendant: Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Capt. Christopher Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sam v. Tachie-Menson
as 4:2022cv00953
Plaintiff: Bishop Ishmael Sam
Defendant: JERRY TACHIE-MENSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Reyes v. Matagorda County et al
as 3:2022cv00026
Plaintiff: Maria Ramos Reyes
Defendant: Matagorda County, Frank D Osborne, Ishmael Villarreal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bishop Ishmael Sam v. Tachie-Menson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv03334
Plaintiff: BISHOP ISHMAEL SAM and Bishop Sam
Defendant: JERRY TACHIE-MENSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Harris County S/O
as 4:2019cv05012
Defendant: Harris County S/O
Plaintiff: Ishmael Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANZALDUA
as 6:2013mc00006
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent: ISHMAEL T ANZALDUA
Tibbs v. Thaler et al
as 3:2010cv00127
Plaintiff: James Ishmael Tibbs
Defendant: Rick Thaler, Lumkin, Williams and others
Amicu: Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tibbs v. Thaler
as 4:2009cv04121
Petitioner: James Ishmael Tibbs
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02740
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?