Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Marquez v. C.R. England, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00868
Defendant:
Ivam Miranda Paes and C.R. England, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Wilderness Oak LLC et al v. Anthony
as 5:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Wilderness Oak LLC, Stonemark Management, Miranda Ybarra and others
Defendant:
Thomas Anthony,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ebersole et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Dylan Eugene Taylor
Defendant:
FNU Waters and Miranda B. Ebersole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafta v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Lafta
Defendant:
State of Texas, Heman Marion Sweatt, Roscoe Properties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Gonzalez v. Miranda Cirilo
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Arturo Roberto Gonzalez
Defendant:
Gustavo Alonso Miranda Cirilo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Castro v. Tyson et al
as 6:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Miranda Castro
Defendant:
Logan Tyson and DoorDash Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Miranda v. Kendall County, Texas
as 5:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Miranda
Defendant:
Kendall County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miranda et al v. Bexar County
as 5:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miranda and Margaret Miranda
Defendant:
Bexar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Evans et al
as 1:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Joel Smith
Defendant:
Paul Evans, D.A. Miranda Bbersole and D.A. Miranda Ebersole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Goudreaux et al
as 5:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Martin Pena, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer FNU Goudreaux, Officer FNU Estrada, E. Fuentes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
