Cases 11 - 20 of 343
DeiuLio v. Baydu
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Adam M. DeiuLio
Defendant:
Dr. Baydu and Dr. Haydu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Adams, Sr.
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC and Pilot Travel Centers, LLC doing business as Pilot Flying J
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Kelinsky v. Brady Corporation, et al.
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
ADAM KELINSKY
Defendant:
BRADY CORPORATION and AIO ACQUISITION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Adams v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Kenyatta H. Adams
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Custis v. Exmore Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Exmore Police Department, Adam Zieger, Jonathan Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puller v. Dotson et al
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Toccara Yvonne Puller and Toccara Y. Puller
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Adam Krischer and Judge Fiorre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Mohawk Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Mark Adams
Defendant:
Mohawk Industries, Inc. and DAL-TILE, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0041 Federal Trade Commission Act
Adams v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tyler Chase Adams
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
