Cases 31 - 40 of 2,279
Santiago v. Zudima et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Defendant:
Unnamed Employee of Lynchburg Police Department and Ryan Zudima
Plaintiff:
Timothy Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2024cv00039
Defendant:
The City of Lynchburg, Virginia State Trooper John Roe, LPD Officers John Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lee Brown, Jr. and Da'Quan Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Phillips v. Neilly et al
as 7:2024cv00447
Defendant:
David Morris, Dennis Gardner, Amy Neilly and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas B. Phillips, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Burke v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Defendant:
John Shoda, Counselor Jarrell, Reagan Coe and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00445
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
Rose v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 6:2024cv00034
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Bobbi L. Perkins Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wesley v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Calvin Wesley
Defendant:
LPD Officer Seth Reed and The City of Lynchburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
