Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Chandler v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00147
Petitioner:
Michael Chandler
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curran v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2018cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Francis Curran, III
Defendant:
Dewayne Hendrix, J. Ware, Richard Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cordle v. Rubenstein et al
as 5:2016cv00018
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dale Griffith, Jim Rubenstein and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Cordle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buzzard v. Rubenstein et al
as 5:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
David Dean Buzzard, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Karen Pszczolkowski, Ryan Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buzzard v. Rubenstein et al
as 3:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
David Dean Buzzard, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Karen Pszczolkowski, Ryan Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Christine Chandler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Figaniak et al v. Fraternal Order of Owl's Home Nest et al
as 5:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Figaniak and Valerie A. Figaniak
Defendant:
Fraternal Order of Owl's Home Nest , Loyal Order of Owls Nest Lodge 2558, Ye Olde Alpha, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chandler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
Carolyn C. Chandler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chandler v. Carter
as 5:2013cv00050
Petitioner:
Eddie Chandler
Respondent:
Anne Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chandler v. Allen et al
as 3:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
Eddie Chandler
Defendant:
Carter Franklin Allen and Larry Amerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
