General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Coleman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00527
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden
Petitioner: Kavanaugh Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Casillas v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00519
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden
Petitioner: David Casillas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 5:2024cv00505
Petitioner: Charles W. Jones
Respondent: Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Farmer v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00503
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden
Petitioner: Gerald E. Farmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Young v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00498
Petitioner: Tyrone Young
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dickerson v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00491
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden Holzapfel
Petitioner: Jermaine D. Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bates v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner: Keandre Bates
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Casillas v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00483
Petitioner: David Casillas
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Merriweather v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00480
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden Holzapfel
Petitioner: Danny Merriweather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gibson v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00463
Petitioner: Malcolm Gibson
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?