Civil Rights Featured Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 823
Plaintiff v. Defendant Featured Case
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ms. L. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00428
Respondent: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, Greg Archambeault and others
Petitioner: Ms. L., Ms. C., Dora and others
Not Classified By Court: Lesbi Martinez-Martinez and Ms. M. D-L
Amicus Curiae: Michael Wishnie, et al., amici curiae, Children's Rights., Inc., et al., amici curiae and Scholars of Habeas Corpus and Constitutional Law
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Sines et al v. Kessler et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00072
Defendant: Matthew Heimbach, Nationalist Front, Augustus Sol Invictus and others
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 3, Marissa Blair, John Doe and others
Petitioner: David Duke, James Hart Stern, Denise Y. Lunsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
L.B. v. Harrison County School District et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff: L.B.
Defendant: Harrison County School District, Harrison County School Board, Mitchell King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
STRZOK v. GARLAND et al Featured Case
as 1:2019cv02367
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FBI DIRECTOR CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff: PETER STRZOK
Petitioner: DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
Intervenor: LISA PAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00871
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
MEADOWS v. PELOSI et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv03217
Plaintiff: MARK MEADOWS
Defendant: NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Intervenor: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv02292
Plaintiff: Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami and others
Intervenor: Our Family Coalition, Lavender Seniors of the East Bay, Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays and others
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Mark B. Horton and others
Respondent: William T. Criswell
Not Yet Classified: Proposition 8 Official Proponents, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Californians Against Eliminating Basic Rights
Interested Party: Media Coalition
Not Classified By Court: Doug Swardstrom, Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, James L Garlow and others
Amicus Curiae: City and County of San Francisco, ACLU Foundation of Northern California, Equality California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VINDMAN v. TRUMP et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00257
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER VINDMAN
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP, JR., RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI, JULIA HAHN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
St. Timothy's Episcopal Church et al v. City of Brookings Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00156
Plaintiff: St. Timothy's Episcopal Church, The Diocese of Oregon, The Episcopal Diocese of Oregon and others
Defendant: City of Brookings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?